Hi all. If one of the developers would be so kind as to test & commit four of the five bugs marked as outstanding for 1.0, we'll start moving forward again :-) The four bugs are: bug #22, 34, 50, and 65. All four have patches attached, and are all really quite easy to test; the behaviour seen and desired is described in the comments. It should be pretty easy to test them all quickly and commit them in one batch. (Why can't I test them? Well, they're my patches, and the new rule is that somebody other than the patch writer has to test them before they're committed to CVS... ensures that part of the patch isn't forgotten ;-) When you've tested them to your satisfaction, please edit the attachments you tested and set the review flag to "+" (approved) if they pass, and post a comment describing any bugs you found if they don't pass. If you can commit them to CVS, please do so and close the bugs as "fixed"; if you don't have CVS commit access, you can still test them... -- -janra | http://www.write-on.indy/ (OpenNIC) Who needs to be big and burly when | http://www.write-on.org/ (ICANN) you can just apply physics? | Discuss the art and craft of writing