Sorry. I've finally gotten Scoop-CURRENT working, but I managed to screw it up. It's synced up with the main branch of scoop now, though, so it should be OK now. The only branches that there are right now are HEAD (aka MAIN, aka .) and CURRENT. Fow now, just commit stuff as you always did. I'm going to write something up about how CURRENT's going to work. It won't really start taking off until after scoop-1.0 gets released anyway, but I needed to branch it off now so coryking's stuff could start getting worked on without interfering with the 1.0 release. I'll get something whipped up in the next couple of days about STABLE and CURRENT Scoop, and my ideas of how they'll work after Scoop 1.0 comes out. -j On 29/12/03 23:09 +0000, Hulver wrote: > Like the subject line says. > > What branches are there in CVS, which should we be checking bug fixes > against, and which should we be checking new features against. > > It would be nice to see a post on the mailing list about this, as the > latest logs from cvs-commit is the first mention I've seen about > multiple branches. > -- > http://www.hulver.com/scoop/ > > Hulver's site. -- ---------------------------------------------- /* You are not expected to understand this. */ Captain_Tenille http://www.satanosphere.com/ http://www.kuro5hin.org/ jeremy at satanosphere.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.kuro5hin.org/pipermail/scoop-dev/attachments/20031229/07c1ee63/attachment.bin